The Science of Surface Engineering: Dr. Larry Davidson Discusses Texture’s Impact on Spinal Fusion

 The Science of Surface Engineering: Dr. Larry Davidson Discusses Texture’s Impact on Spinal Fusion

Bone fusion is the cornerstone of many spinal surgeries, particularly in procedures like spinal fusion and interbody device placement. The ability of an implant to integrate with bone tissue directly affects the long-term success of the surgery. Dr. Larry Davidson, an experienced specialist in spinal care, recognizes that one of the most impactful advancements in this area is the development of implant surface texture. From smooth to rough, micro- to nano-level modifications, implant surfaces are being engineered to actively promote faster and stronger bone fusion.

Surgeons and biomedical engineers have found that optimizing surface texture supports structural stability and creates an environment where bone cells can thrive. Textured surfaces mimic natural bone structures, guiding biological responses that lead to improved bonding and biomechanical performance.

The Science Behind Bone Fusion

Bone fusion or osseointegration is the process by which living bone tissue grows and bonds with the surface of an implant. This biological process is essential for ensuring that the implanted device remains stable over time and performs its intended function.

Several factors influence the quality of bone fusion: patient health, surgical technique, implant material and, critically, the device’s surface characteristics. A well-textured implant surface provides more area for bone cells to attach, proliferate and differentiate, ultimately speeding up the healing process and reducing the risk of implant failure.

Why Surface Texture Matters

Surface texture enhances bone fusion by increasing the surface area available for bone cell adhesion. It also affects how proteins, blood and cellular signals interact with the implant in the immediate postoperative period. Smooth implants offer minimal engagement, often leading to fibrous tissue formation rather than direct bone attachment.

On the other hand, rough, porous or patterned textures create microenvironments that encourage osteoblast activity, the bone-building cells that play a central role in fusion. These textures can guide the deposition of bone matrix, support vascularization and promote the formation of strong, continuous bone around the implant.

Types of Surface Textures and Their Benefits

Modern spinal implants incorporate a variety of textures, each engineered to influence bone healing in specific ways:

  • Microrough Surfaces: These textures provide microscopic ridges and valleys that enhance cellular attachment achieved through techniques like sandblasting or acid etching.
  • Nanotextures: At the nanometer scale, textures influence protein adsorption and cellular signaling. These surfaces can stimulate osteogenic differentiation and enhance early-stage healing.
  • Porous Surfaces: Large-scale porosity allows the bone to grow into the implant itself, improving mechanical interlock and long-term fixation.
  • Lattice and Trabecular Designs: These mimic the internal structure of cancellous bone, creating a scaffold-like architecture that supports deep bone in-growth and vascular infiltration.

Each of these approaches has demonstrated improved osseointegration and reduced rates of nonunion, particularly when used in interbody fusion cages and vertebral body replacements.

Material Considerations and Surface Engineering

The surface texture must be tailored to the underlying material. For example:

  • Titanium implants are often roughened or coated with hydroxyapatite to promote bonding, as titanium alone is biologically inert.
  • PEEK implants, while radiolucent and biomechanically compatible with bone, do not naturally support bone adhesion. They often require surface coatings or modifications, such as titanium plasma spray or nanoscale HA coatings, to improve integration.
  • 3D-printed implants allow for precise control over both macro and micro-scale textures, enabling patient-specific designs that combine porosity and texture in one construct.

Clinical Evidence Supporting Textured Implants

Multiple clinical studies have confirmed the benefits of surface texture in spinal implants. Implants with micro- or nano-textured surfaces have demonstrated:

  • Faster fusion rates: Reduced time to achieve radiographic and clinical signs of union.
  • Higher fusion success: Improved long-term stability and reduced incidence of pseudarthrosis.
  • Reduced migration and subsidence: Stronger bone-implant interfaces lower the risk of implant shifting or sinking.
  • Better patient outcomes: Faster recovery, reduced pain and lower revision rates.

Surgical Benefits and Efficiency

For surgeons, textured implants offer more than biological benefits; they enhance surgical precision and reduce intraoperative concerns. A well-textured implant is easier to secure in place, reducing the need for supplementary fixation. The improved integration can also reduce reliance on bone grafts or biology, simplifying the procedure and minimizing risks.


Textured implants may allow for shorter recovery protocols, as they provide earlier mechanical stability. It is particularly valuable in high-risk patients or in procedures where rapid mobilization is critical to overall health.


Dr. Larry Davidson remarks, “Emerging minimally spinal surgical techniques have certainly changed the way that we are able to perform various types of spinal fusions. All of these innovations are aimed at allowing for an improved patient outcome and overall experience.” Textured implants complement these advancements by supporting more stable, efficient and patient-friendly surgical outcomes.

Role in Adjacent Segment Health

Proper osseointegration, supported by textured surfaces, also contributes to adjacent segment preservation. When an implant is well integrated, it minimizes micromotion and uneven load transfer, two common causes of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD). By reducing stress on neighboring discs and joints, textured implants support more natural biomechanics and long-term spinal balance.

Combining Texture with Smart Technologies

The future of spinal implant design lies in combining intelligent textures with emerging technologies such as:

  • Bioactive coatings: Incorporating antibiotics, anti-inflammatories or growth factors into the surface texture.
  • Sensor integration: Embedding micro-sensors into textured implants to monitor healing and load distribution in real-time.
  • AI-driven modeling: Using patient-specific data to design optimal surface geometries based on bone density, age and other biomechanical factors.

Patient Education and Confidence

Patients often have questions about implant safety and recovery. Surgeons can boost confidence by explaining how textured surfaces promote natural bone healing, reduce complications and minimize the need for additional surgeries. Visual aids, models or before-and-after imaging examples can help patients appreciate the role of implant texture in their recovery.

This transparent communication also improves treatment adherence and empowers patients to take a more active role in post-op care.

The Future Is Textured

Surface texture has developed from a secondary design feature into a primary factor driving implant performance. By facilitating bone fusion at the cellular level, textured implants are helping surgeons achieve more predictable, efficient and long-lasting results.

The right texture can mean the difference between a routine recovery and a prolonged or complicated one. As implant technologies continue to change, textured surfaces can remain central to achieving biomechanical harmony, biological integration and surgical success.

Michael Burden